Barton Household 1,2,3-TCP Checklist After Equipment Failure in Great Bend Water
$1,450.00
Whole House 1,2,3-TCP Reduction Water Filter System - Trichloropropane Removal
✓ Free shipping in the USA · ✓ 90-day returns · ✓ Secure checkout
Samples and Wells Behind EPA 1,2,3-TCP Figures in Great Bend
Number of Samples and Testing Period
The City of Great Bend public water system collected 20 samples from January to July 2015 to measure 1,2,3-trichloropropane (1,2,3-TCP) levels under the federal Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR3).
Detection Results Summary
None of these samples showed 1,2,3-TCP above the reporting level of 0.03 micrograms per liter (µg/L). This measurement indicates the presence was either below detection or undetected, with no health-based violations reported for the system.
Sample Size and Regional Representation
The 20 samples represent public groundwater sources serving over 14,000 people through more than 6,000 connections. While informative for system-wide conditions, these data do not specify any individual household's water quality.
Differences Between Aesthetic Secondary Standards and Health-Based Limits for 1,2,3-TCP
Health-Based Violation Status
EPA records for Great Bend show zero health-based violations related to 1,2,3-TCP according to current standards. This means federal regulations find no evidence of health risk requiring remedial action for the water system.
Aesthetic Compared to Health Measurements
Aesthetic secondary standards, which often address taste or staining concerns, do not apply to 1,2,3-TCP since it lacks a federal secondary standard. Therefore, all reporting focuses on health-based evaluations only.
Implications for Water Quality Monitoring
Detection below reporting levels or non-detection suggests no immediate concern under federal health criteria; however, ongoing monitoring informs system management and consumer awareness.
Public Water System Records Versus Private Well Testing for 1,2,3-TCP
Scope of Public System Data
Data for Great Bend covers groundwater sources supplying the municipal system, representing a broad regional sample rather than an individual home's water conditions.
Limitations of Public System Records
System-wide monitoring does not replace the need for private well testing, especially if existing treatment equipment has failed, as local well water may differ substantially.
When to Test Your Own Water
Households experiencing treatment failures should consider independent laboratory testing to determine specific 1,2,3-TCP levels and tailor solutions accordingly.
Household Symptoms Consistent and Inconsistent with 1,2,3-TCP Presence
Common Signs Not Linked to 1,2,3-TCP
Water discoloration, sediment, or mineral staining are unrelated to 1,2,3-TCP and suggest other water quality issues.
Potential Indicators Associated with 1,2,3-TCP
1,2,3-TCP is a volatile organic compound without distinctive taste or odor, so sensory detection by household members is unlikely.
Symptom Evaluation Guidance
Because 1,2,3-TCP is not noticeable without testing, lack of water appearance or taste changes does not guarantee absence; laboratory analysis is essential.
Effects of Sample Depth, Well Depth, and Source Type on Expected 1,2,3-TCP Levels
Groundwater Source Characteristics
Great Bend's water system draws from groundwater, which may vary in contaminant levels based on aquifer depth and local geology.
Deeper Wells Versus Shallow Wells
Typically, deeper wells may encounter different contaminant profiles than shallow private wells, influencing 1,2,3-TCP presence and concentrations.
Impact on Household Water Quality
Households reliant on private wells should consider how well construction and depth affect their specific water chemistry, which differs from public system records.
Additional Considerations for Commercial or Industrial Water Users
Higher Volume and Regulatory Requirements
Commercial or industrial users may face greater scrutiny for 1,2,3-TCP and require tailored testing frequency and treatment solutions.
Process-Specific Water Quality Impacts
Operations sensitive to volatile organic compounds should evaluate the potential impacts of 1,2,3-TCP on their processes beyond residential concerns.
Compliance and Reporting
Commercial facilities often have distinct reporting obligations that differ from residential consumers and involve coordination with local authorities.
In summary, Great Bend's public water system testing detected no 1,2,3-TCP above reporting levels and holds no health-based violations. However, for households experiencing equipment failure, independent water testing is essential to determine local conditions. Should 1,2,3-TCP be present, the Fleck 1,2,3-TCP Filter ships ready to configure as a direct-purchase solution addressing this specific contaminant.
Where this information comes from
Source: EPA SDWIS public water system record. Sampled 2015-07-21. These figures describe the public water system's record, not the plumbing inside any individual building.
On record: EPA UCMR3 monitoring (2013-2015) for City of Great Bend (KS2000911), KS: 20 results across 1 listed contaminants, 0 detections above the reporting level; nothing detected above the method reporting level