Great Bend Barton 1,4-Dioxane Water Records and Household Treatment After Equipment Failure
$2,575.00
WSP Whole House 1,4-Dioxane Reduction System
✓ Free shipping in the USA · ✓ 90-day returns · ✓ Secure checkout
Seasonal and Multi-Year Variation in Local 1,4-Dioxane Testing
The City of Great Bend’s public water system underwent monitoring during 2013 to 2015 as part of the EPA’s third Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR3). Across twenty sampling events, 1,4-Dioxane appeared only once above the reporting level of 0.07 micrograms per liter (µg/L), registering 0.14 µg/L in early 2015. This single detection does not indicate a persistent or recurring high concentration, but rather a snapshot within a range of mostly nondetectable results over this multi-year timeframe.
Additional Operational Questions Beyond Residential Needs
Unlike commercial or industrial settings, household water use rarely demands analysis of system-wide variations or high-volume treatment capacities. Commercial operators might consider fluctuating influent concentrations or regulatory reporting obligations. Residential users need to focus on their home’s specific water quality, especially when existing equipment designed to treat 1,4-Dioxane is no longer performing as intended.
Understanding What the Recorded 1,4-Dioxane Levels Indicate
EPA monitoring identifies 1,4-Dioxane at levels well below the agency’s cancer risk reference concentration of 0.35 µg/L. The absence of any health-based violations on record for Great Bend’s water system confirms compliance with federal safety expectations. It is important to emphasize that a detected presence does not imply unsafe water, nor does it establish the exact concentration at individual taps. Homeowners must obtain specific testing of their water to determine their own exposure.
Comparing Great Bend’s Data with Neighboring Barton County Areas
Regional monitoring data may show varying 1,4-Dioxane findings in counties adjacent to Barton, but direct comparisons should be made cautiously. Differences in water sources, treatment methods, and sampling frequency can affect results. Relying solely on Great Bend’s system record provides a documented baseline, but private wells or other municipal suppliers in Barton County may exhibit different profiles requiring separate assessment.
Distinguishing Public System Records from Private Well Testing
Public water system records represent combined conditions of groundwater sources and treatment across thousands of connections, averaging water quality over time and area. By contrast, private well testing reflects conditions at a single point and time, which can substantially differ. When existing household equipment fails, evaluating localized water tests is essential to identify specific treatment needs rather than relying only on system-wide public data.
Summary: EPA records for Great Bend document occasional low-level 1,4-Dioxane detections without health violations, underscoring that municipal water meets regulatory standards. For households experiencing treatment failure, targeted water testing can clarify their conditions and guide equipment replacement decisions such as with the C-Series 1,4-Dioxane Filter, which ships ready to configure for residential use.
Where this information comes from
Source: EPA SDWIS public water system record. Sampled 2015-07-21. These figures describe the public water system's record, not the plumbing inside any individual building.
On record: EPA UCMR3 monitoring (2013-2015) for City of Great Bend (KS2000911), KS: 20 results across 1 listed contaminants, 1 detections above the reporting level; no federal MCL; EPA cancer risk reference concentration 0.35 ug/L