Household Decisions on 1,4-Dioxane in Barnstable County Water
$864.00
✓ Free shipping in the USA · ✓ 90-day returns · ✓ Secure checkout
If you know 1,4-dioxane is detected locally but don’t know your own water’s severity
Many residents in Yarmouth, Barnstable County, are aware that 1,4-dioxane—a synthetic solvent stabilizer and cyclic ether—has been found in their public water supply. It is important to understand that government monitoring data for the Yarmouth Water Department, serving about 38,900 people with groundwater sources, show detections of 1,4-dioxane in some measurements but do not establish a specific concentration at your tap.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) public water system records for 2013 to 2015 indicate 1,4-dioxane was detected in 10 out of 26 samples at levels ranging from the reporting level of 0.07 micrograms per liter (µg/L or parts per billion, ppb) up to 0.17 µg/L. This is below the EPA’s cancer risk reference concentration of 0.35 µg/L, and there is no federal maximum contaminant level (MCL) set for 1,4-dioxane in drinking water at this time. Detection means the compound was measured, not that the water is unsafe or that any regulatory limit has been exceeded.
If you want to understand how reverse osmosis treats 1,4-dioxane and what its rejection rates mean
Reverse osmosis (RO) is often cited as capable of reducing contaminants in water by a certain percentage. However, the reported percentage rejection rates for cyclic ethers like 1,4-dioxane are helpful but not absolute guarantees for any home’s water. Effectiveness can vary due to water chemistry, pressure, and membrane condition.
Because 1,4-dioxane is a small, highly soluble solvent stabilizer molecule, its partial rejection by RO membranes means some fraction may pass through. Thus, RO should be viewed as part of a multi-barrier approach rather than a sole solution if precise control of 1,4-dioxane is desired.
If you expect carbon filtration or boiling to address 1,4-dioxane and wonder about documented alternatives
Conventional activated carbon filters and boiling have limited effectiveness on 1,4-dioxane. The molecule’s chemical structure makes it resistant to adsorption by standard carbon media and thermally stable at boiling temperatures.
Documented technologies for more reliable reduction include specialized filtration methods designed for cyclic ethers. One such option available directly for consumer use is the Fleck 1,4-Dioxane Filter. It ships ready to configure for household water treatment and targets the solvent stabilizer specifically.
If you consider how your water source depth and sampling affect expectations for 1,4-dioxane levels
Groundwater sources vary in vulnerability to contamination from surface activities. This public water system uses groundwater, and 1,4-dioxane presence reflects local industrial or chemical use in the region rather than characteristics of any individual household well.
Well depth and sampling location influence detected concentrations. Deeper wells or different aquifers might show lower or different results. The regional data should not be taken to represent your specific water without independent testing of your supply.
If you have a large household, seasonal residence, or secondary property in the region
Water demand patterns affect the choice of treatment equipment capacity and configuration. A larger household or a seasonal home in Yarmouth may need systems that handle varying flows and usage to maintain effectiveness against contaminants like 1,4-dioxane.
Considering the documented demand and testing your water for the cyclic ether concentration will guide selecting a treatment that matches your household size and water use habits.
In summary, to manage the cyclic ether 1,4-dioxane detected in Yarmouth’s Barnstable County water system, you should test your household water for precise concentration. Then consider a targeted treatment option such as the Fleck 1,4-Dioxane Filter, which is documented to address this contaminant. It ships ready to configure, enabling direct purchase and use in residential settings requiring specific control of solvent stabilizers in groundwater-based water supplies.
Where this information comes from
Source: EPA SDWIS public water system record. Sampled 2015-09-17. These figures describe the public water system's record, not the plumbing inside any individual building.
On record: EPA UCMR3 monitoring (2013-2015) for Yarmouth Water Department (MA4351000), MA: 26 results across 1 listed contaminants, 10 detections above the reporting level; no federal MCL; EPA cancer risk reference concentration 0.35 ug/L