C-Series 1,4-Dioxane Filter

C-Series 1,4-Dioxane Filter

Request a Quote

View full details

1. Why 1,4-Dioxane Moves Ahead of the Solvent Plume It Stabilised, and What That Means Downgradient

In the groundwater serving North Kingstown, Washington County, 1,4-dioxane—a cyclic ether commonly used as a solvent stabiliser—has a tendency to migrate ahead of the main plume of other solvents. This behavior occurs because dioxane is highly soluble in water and does not easily adhere to soil particles, allowing it to travel faster and farther than many other chemical contaminants.

For residents, this means that even if a known plume of solvent contamination is located some distance away, 1,4-dioxane could already be present in well water or public supply sources closer to home. Since the local water supply is sourced from groundwater, understanding this movement is key to anticipating the presence of the cyclic ether in tap water.

2. How Landfill Leachate, Degreasing Sites and Consumer Products Each Contribute to the Record

The occurrence of 1,4-dioxane in North Kingstown’s water system results from multiple sources. Landfill leachate can introduce the solvent stabiliser into the groundwater as materials break down under the surface. Industrial activities, particularly degreasing operations for metal parts, also contribute to the presence of dioxane due to its use in solvent mixtures.

Additionally, household and commercial consumer products containing 1,4-dioxane may enter wastewater streams and eventually seep into groundwater. These combined inputs explain why monitoring has detected the cyclic ether intermittently in the public water supply.

3. A Worked Example: Reading the Record's Median and Range as a Homeowner Would

The United States Environmental Protection Agency conducted monitoring of the Town of North Kingstown’s public water system from 2013 to 2015. During this period, 18 samples for 1,4-dioxane were collected. Of those, 3 showed detections above the reporting level of 0.07 micrograms per liter (µg/L), equivalent to 0.07 parts per billion (ppb).

The highest measured concentration was 0.096 µg/L, while the median of those detections was 0.074 µg/L. It is important to note these measurements come from the system’s overall record and do not represent the specific concentration in any individual home’s water. Only direct testing of a residence’s water can establish that figure.

4. How Reverse Osmosis Rejection Rates Are Stated and Why a Percentage Is Not a Guarantee

Water treatment technologies such as reverse osmosis are often described by their percentage rejection rates for removing compounds like 1,4-dioxane. However, such percentages vary based on system design, water chemistry, and operational conditions. A stated rejection figure does not guarantee that a specific household will achieve the same result.

Therefore, while reverse osmosis can reduce levels of the cyclic ether, system performance should be considered alongside monitoring and water testing, especially after the failure of previous treatment equipment.

5. Why Aesthetic Secondary Standards Differ from Health-Based Limits, Applied to This Constituent

The EPA public record for North Kingstown shows zero health-based violations for 1,4-dioxane, as none of the detected concentrations exceed federal health reference values like the cancer risk reference concentration of 0.35 µg/L. Meanwhile, aesthetic secondary standards, which address taste, odor, and staining issues, do not apply to the solvent stabiliser.

Consequently, detection of 1,4-dioxane does not indicate the water is unsafe or in violation of regulations. It is simply a documented presence in the system’s groundwater source.

6. How Many Samples and Wells Stand Behind the Figures, and What a Small Sample Means

The sampling summarized in the EPA record reflects results from 18 tests between July 2013 and January 2014. This dataset provides an overview of the public water system’s water quality rather than comprehensive site-specific information. Limited sample numbers mean occasional detections may not capture all fluctuations or localized variations.

For an individual household, testing of their specific source water remains the only way to determine actual levels of the solvent stabiliser present after equipment failure.

Closing: When existing treatment equipment no longer effectively addresses 1,4-dioxane in your home’s water, the documented solution is the C-Series 1,4-Dioxane Filter. This technology ships ready to configure and is designed to meet the household’s daily water demand as measured. Direct water testing combined with this targeted approach offers a practical means to manage the cyclic ether’s presence in North Kingstown residences.

Where this information comes from

Source: EPA SDWIS public water system record. Sampled 2014-01-30. These figures describe the public water system's record, not the plumbing inside any individual building.

On record: EPA UCMR3 monitoring (2013-2015) for Town of North Kingstown (RI1559517), RI: 18 results across 1 listed contaminants, 3 detections above the reporting level; no federal MCL; EPA cancer risk reference concentration 0.35 ug/L

Newsletter

A short sentence describing what someone will receive by subscribing